Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. More templates for data availability statements, including examples of openly available and restricted access datasets, are available here: This journal strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely are available to readers. Definition: Black and white graphic with no shading. Further, please note that the manuscript status might not always be updated instantly. All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate). Examples of statements to be used for a retrospective study: Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of University A in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care. 2002 Can you put your timelines? I recently submitted a paper to a Nature journal. Posted on . If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article When reporting a study that involved human participants, their data or biological material, authors should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) and certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Now (4 days after the initial submission), it is now under the status of "Editorial Decision Started". Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*: Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. If address information is provided with the affiliation(s) it will also be published. //-->Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between "Editorial Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially; patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by publication of this manuscript. The retraction note should provide transparency which parts of the article are impacted by the error. The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. This section outlines our Editorial Policies for all Science Journals. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. Indicate what graphics program was used to create the artwork. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of [THIRD PARTY NAME]. These contributions should be listed at the separate title page. [CDATA[// >Nature Communications The trial registration number (TRN), date of registration and the words 'retrospectively registered should be included as the last line of the manuscript abstract. My understanding is that "Editorial Decision Started" means an Editor has been assigned and is reviewing the manuscript. Biotechnology Letters | Submission guidelines - Springer Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Does it mean that my paper was under consideration only in terms of its format, scope etc. Color art is free of charge for print and online publication. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. //-->sciencenature - But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". All Rights Reserved. If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Your cover letter must include a valid institutional email address for each author. For the purposes of the data availability statement, data is defined as the minimal dataset that would be necessary to interpret, replicate and build upon the findings reported in the article. There are 2 routes to submit a research manuscript to Review Commons: The recommended route is first to post the manuscript as a preprint on bioRxiv or medRxiv. Please do not suggest anyone who may have a conflict of interest in reviewing your manuscript, such as former advisors, students, or recent collaborators. As PLOS Biology celebrates its 20 th anniversary, our April issue focuses on biotechnology with articles covering different aspects of the field, from genome editing to synthetic biology. Review articles therefore require a disclosure statement.Other article types such as editorials, book reviews, comments (amongst others) may, dependent on their content, require a disclosure statement. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Out of . In addition, they should exclude themselves from handling manuscripts in cases where there is a competing interest. Checklists are available for a number of study designs, including: Randomised trials (CONSORT) and Study protocols (SPIRIT), Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and protocols (Prisma-P), Diagnostic/prognostic studies (STARD) and (TRIPOD), Clinical practice guidelines (AGREE) and (RIGHT). The WHO defines health interventions as A health intervention is an act performed for, with or on behalf of a person or population whose purpose is to assess, improve, maintain, promote or modify health, functioning or health conditions and a health-related outcome is generally defined as a change in the health of a person or population as a result of an intervention. The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. Springer Nature Author Services , , , , . Authors may request that their paper be reinstated one more time under a new DOI. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process. The trial registration number (TRN) and date of registration should be included as the last line of the manuscript abstract. Please be aware that some publishers do not grant electronic rights for free and that Springer will not be able to refund any costs that may have occurred to receive these permissions. This journal encourages authors to adopt RRIDs when reporting key biological resources (antibodies, cell lines, model organisms and tools) in their manuscripts. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their institution and seek ethics approval where needed. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. Authors should follow the recommendations of the IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Most institutions will have specific policies on this subject. Glitches in the system at the journals end could be another possibility. Part of If your manuscript issent out for peer review, you will receive an email asking you to read and sign our Editorial Policies. [CDATA[> Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. I am anxious as I heard that usually the editor just needs 1 week to decide if a paper deservesto be sent for peer review or not. See also Authorship Principles. In such cases, material from other sources should be used. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. 2: Nucleic Acids (Walker, J. institution, (department), city, (state), country, A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author, Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials, Trial registration number and date of registration, followed by retrospectively registered, for retrospectively registered trials. This should be placed after the References section. Pranav Pandit over 4 years Another update: I got an update from the editor finally after email her asking what it really means. Please make sure your title page contains the following information. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Sustainability known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. To appeal against a decision, or transfer your submission to another journalAppeals and Transfers. Please refer to the Authorship Principles section below for more information on how to complete this section. Data availability statements should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found, if applicable. Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. Definition: Photographs, drawings, or paintings with fine shading, etc. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. . Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journals and/or Publishers implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article, - an expression of concern may be placed with the article. Answered by Shalender Singh Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current. Authors will be asked to resolve the dispute themselves. Authors are recommended to adhere to the minimum reporting guidelines hosted by the EQUATOR Network when preparing their manuscript. If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. If an appendix appears in your article and it contains one or more figures, continue the consecutive numbering of the main text.