That is a beast and my first 2 eyepiece. There's also a comfort factor. They make a good addition to the Stellaruve brandedplanetary eyepieces he has already been selling. Converted grades are calculated using the modified Bavarian formula, as stipulated by the resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz (German PDF, 0,1MB). Yes, for standard 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filters. But the twist-up mechanism in one unit I tested (which I exchanged) was loose and rattled. The 4.5mm Morpheus is sharper than the Ethos SX, by a hair. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? For low power, large FOV, I recommend you limit the eyepiece focal length to ~35 mm (thus a 7 mm exit pupil.) For a differentiated assessment of the examination performances, the grades can be increased or decreased by 0.3 to intermediate values; the grades 0.7 and 5.3 are excluded. But what matters is who you buy it from, the specifications, customer service, reliability, and price (of course), when making your actual purchasing decision. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. Uhno. Teasing me? of Students: approx. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Good decision! F/7 is more forgiving than faster scopes so that does help. I figured out my preferred fov and eye relief by purchasing used eyepieces here on CN. They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). I did sell a lot of axiom LXs though, and owned the 23mm for a while and was impressed with it. In WO livery the 4mm's a nice ep for those nights that support it. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers. For me, I love 82 degrees, it feels just right. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. Back in my youth I worked for a company that "made" computer monitors and the OEM was required to make it to our specs, but others were not. The LHD series includes four other focal lengths, all with 20mm eye relief, and with the 4mm, 6mm and 9mm eyepieces having 1.25-inch barrels but very tall form factors. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Oh, barlowed the 15mm starts to show curvature around the 80-85% mark for my eye and the 4 and the 8mm the same since already barlowed. I'm hoping they will be sharp to the edge at f/7. However, the Omegon and Meade both have apparent fields closer to 90 as I measured it. Anything is possible. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). My bad experience with the 14 Meade put a bad taste in my mouth so I stuck to the big series 4000 version, and never gave the 5000s and axiom LX much thought even when I had access to try them whenever I wanted . The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. It performs well on faster telescopes, a key characteristic of Nagler and Ethos eyepieces. I tested it side by side with my 9 mm Nagler on my SV-105 and I could not see any difference. I'll be curiously watching how this pans out as to the origins of these EP's, if they end up being the old UWANs they are priced pretty competitively. The grades represent the following assessments of the examination performances: Talent Development, Scholarships and Awards, Verification of Study Periods for Pension Insurance, Mission Statement and Teaching Constitution, TUM Center for Digital Leadership Development, Digital Programs of Executive and Professional Education, Office of the Senior Executive Vice President, TUMonline TUMs campus management portal, Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz, 1.01.5 very good: excellent performance, 1.62.5 good: performance well above average, 2.63,5 satisfactory: average performance, 3.64.0 sufficient: performance meets the standards in spite of deficiencies, from 4.1 fail: performance does not meet the standards because of substantial deficiencies. The 100 eyepiece tripod. This is a superb eyepiece for the money, with the bonus of argon-filled waterproof construction to keep moisture from penetrating and fogging the eyepiece on humid nights. Edited by betacygni, 05 March 2023 - 10:45 AM. This 2 inch eyepiece is our widest field in the 82 degree range. I haven't used it in the field and it's pretty heavy but it's my best shot and easy access. i think that what you are going to hear is : "what are you interested in looking at ?" All marketing. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. Pros: Very comfortable eye relief; superb optics. I find there are very few choices when it comes choosing a high quality 70 to 82 AFOV design that have enough eye relief for me to see the entire FOV. You are right, he has a complete optical and CNC machine shop at his facility. The Meade and Omegon represent great values. My conclusion from testing this 82 group was that the Explore Scientific came very close to matching the standard-setting premium Tele Vue Nagler, but at a lower price. However, with your eye positioned where it needs to be to see the whole field, the field partially blacks out with squirming kidney-bean shadows (technically called spherical aberration of the exit pupil). I've used them at outreach events and the nice eye relief and the wide viewport really help the public get a good view, especially the little ones that often struggle to find the image. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. Are you looking for a List of Universities in Germany for International Students? Edited by Neanderthal, 05 March 2023 - 09:40 AM. Orion sold them as did WO too. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. Kunming UWA reskins. Thanks. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". I didn't understand how big a deal this was until I bit the bullet and purchased a chair. Although I don't believe I've tried any other the eyepieces. In the refractor, though, the 4.5 Morpheus comes into its own, with plenty of drift time with a focal length over 1100mm shorter. I am also intrigued by the 4mm. Both have the same true FOV and cover the cluster nicely. There was nothing wrong with them. Add 1/8" if rolled up. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. HOW did the Stellarvue EPs work out???? It can just matter on how you want to frame objects personally I feel 60o or less FOV is like looking through a tunnel so I dont use those EP's as much even though I have some. Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. Top 100 Worldwide. Tele Vues Type 6 Naglers are small, light and tack sharp across the field, even on fast f-ratio telescopes. Building an set of eyepieces takes some time. Enter the maximum grade, the minimum passing grade, and your current overall grade in the grading system of your university. The specifications state an 86 apparent field but it appeared to be the same as the other 82 models. They are probably another variation of the UWANs, thought the specified focal lengths have been changed from 7mm to 8mm and from 16mm to 15mm. For 1.25" 82 eyepieces, I have a mixed set of Televue, ES, and UWA. However, on a Schmidt-Cassegrain, with its more forgiving f/10 focal ratio, off-axis sharpness was much better. And of course your first light with the other eyepieces and the sweet SV80A (it's on my short list!). Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. Top-ranked German Universities in Munich. (Cheaper products abound, but you never know what you'll get. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. To be totally fair, not all eyeglass wearers are the same or require the same amount of eye relief. Pros: Best eye relief and off-axis star images. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! Stars are sharp across all but the outer 20 percent. Optical performance also proved similar, with stars in the Meade beginning to distort 60 percent out from the center and appearing fairly aberrated at the edge of field. There are also 60 degree eyepieces like the Starguider ED and Paradigms. Looks like at this time they are all available. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. I like having eyepieces at my fingertips. Bottom Line: Very good performance vs. price. It's the same at low power, which Ernest just pointed out. The true field of view is 0.75 degrees, with an exit pupil of about 1.9 mm. Read Alan Dyers comparison of nine 82-degree eyepieces, Tag List TELESCOPE meade eyepiece Explore Scientific tele vue omegon stellarvue. You may see the shadow of the secondary mirror with this eyepiece and exit pupil. What I dislike is decreasing the AFoV when increasing the magnification, the true field takes a double hit. Accessories, Astrophotography gear, Reviews. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. Several functions may not work. I doubt this as JOC won't sell eyepieces to any US brand other than ES since 2012. That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. Waiting Period: We are in continuous production and operate one year in advance. Very comfortable, bright and sharp. It is plenty wide enough and 1.25 inch 82 degree eyepieces are just so much more compact than their 100 degree counterparts. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. Eyepiece Field of View - Apparent: 82 Eyepiece Focal Length: 8 mm Eyepiece Eye Relief: 12 mm Eyepiece Series: Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Weight: 6.5 oz. A best buy. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. I recently purchased the 9 mm Optimus eyepiece after my excellent experience with the 20 mm Optimus. Just teasing you, David. Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. You currently have javascript disabled. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvue's Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. They're still well regarded, though the 28mm is said to be ergonomically awkward to view through. We are fast approaching "galaxy" season, with the planets in the rear view mirror. Other than that, this eyepiece is excellent and certainly merits your consideration. Thanks for any input if anyone is still watching here. The 16mm is often considered the weakest of the line (though still a decent performer) and I've read a lot of good things about the 4mm. This my first refractor, my first telescope with quality optics, my first telescope with a wide field of view, and my first telescope with a decent focuser (among other firsts) so I am very excited and anxious to get my hands on it. This is not recommended for shared computers. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. If I'm pleased with the SV 28, I may just go with SVs to complete a set, we'll see. Eye relief is 15mm, a little longer than the Explore and Stellarvue competitors. Will 1.25 inch eyepieces fit ES coma corrector? Going Wider: Five 100-Degree Eyepieces Compared, A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces, Price and Quality in a High-Power Zoom: SVBONY 3mm-8mm Zoom Review, Celestron Tabletop Tripod Review: Sometimes Smaller is Better. Except for the Orion Lanthanum 80, all have 1.25-inch barrels and so can be used on any telescope. The result is the equivalent to your grade in the German grading system, where 1.0 is the maximum grade and 4.0 the minimum passing grade. Which points out that the appropriate high power apparent field depends a lot on the focal length of the scope and whether the scope is tracking. The result given here is non-binding, as this grade converter can only provide a general first estimation. All in all, exactly what you'd expect from Stellarvue: A great product at a reasonable price. STELLARVUE OPTIMUS 20MM 100deg 2.0" 9-ELEMENT EYEPIECE Description Technical Specs Extended Information Stellarvue Optimus 20mm 100deg 2" 9-element eyepiece--lighter and sharper than its competition, this eyepiece redefines "wide" field. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #52, private (state-approved) University of Applied Sciences, View all 231 courses still open for next intake, Marketing services for German Universities. Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. Program Fees: 0 - 10,000 (per semester) Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, QS World University . I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. But I'm interested in the 16mm as I don't have a UWA in that focal length (I used to have the old 5000 series Meade 18mm UWA but sold it). TS have kept the old 4/7/16mm focal length specifications. And there are some very good options.. For wide field eyepieces, TeleVue introduced nearly all the modern designs starting with the first Nagler more than 40 years ago. With a 10 inch Newtonian at an f5 focal ratio, the 50mm eyepiece you are considering will produce a 10mm exit pupil. Munich, German Mnchen, city, capital of Bavaria Land (state), southern Germany. I've spent a decent amount of time with an 82-degree eyepiece, but the extra field never seemed very immersive to me. Im hoping these will perform similarly. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. I think probably not. 2023 Astromart.com. It comes with a vinyl storage bag and the eyepiece is fully waterproof it can even be submerged for cleaning! If theres one premium eyepiece to buy, it will likely be in this focal length range. this IS the best value in an ocular that I have found.., I'm super pleased with the product. Omegon in Germany offers many unique products such as their Panorama2 eyepieces. The 8-element Morpheus design provides nearly top-class performance for much less than the premium competition, which would also include Tele Vues 72 Delos series. Pinpoint stars to the edge, M27 is amazing in my 14" Dobsonian. This eyepiece gives me 133x mag in my 10 inch Dobsonian. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. I have never used 100o EP's but they are larger/heavier so you might have balance issues depending on scope/mount setup. No question they set the standard. At 580 grams, it is the heaviest of the 82 set. Edited by jrbarnett, 08 October 2014 - 02:40 PM. With the eyecup folded down it can be used with eyeglasses, but only just. Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. The failure rate, resolution, sharpness, and other subtle differences were there. I think the common view is that they are in the ES class performance wise. I think these are the same that WO(?) sold for a while and that line was 16, 8, 4. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. Or know anything about the design and/or origins?
Broadband Annual A3 Salary Ohio State,
Maroon And Orange Volleyball Tournament 2022,
Lsu Baseball Coach Salary,
Room Service Bistro Columbia, Sc,
Used Trooper Snow Cat For Sale,
Articles S