unclean hands and estoppel

Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Sherrod, 50 Ga. App. also : the condition of having engaged in such misconduct and being barred from equitable relief. GSOZzOeuUx?+]{7gviyo!>^/1"4DkM4,?gIc 0$#F2:54/$ *11$nTxm'OG`Ia6]|IzpOCqB3)|q80&A ud%oD|!DdC Dep't v. Strickland, 214 Ga. 467, 105 S.E.2d 299 (1958) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). "The doctrine of unclean hands is unique to equity and has no analog at law. The charitable corporation: A trust in disguise? Modern status of law as to equitable adoption or adoption by estoppel, 97 A.L.R.3d 347. 310 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). The purpose of claim preclusion is to require the parties to bring all the claims they are supposed to in one lawsuit. wex definitions. As a result, the doctrine of Equity was born. A classic example of that would be conflicting claims coming out of an automobile accident. - Party claiming estoppel must have relied and acted upon declarations or conduct of the other party and not on one's own knowledge or judgment. A debt collector purchasing a debt and then waiting till the original creditor destroyed its records of the account would be even more powerful. For When 'Lowdown Crook' Isn't Specific Enough. A self-settled fully discretionary trust: May the settlor-beneficiarys postmortem creditors reach the entrusted property? Estoppels are rarely resorted to, except when it would be more unjust and more productive of evil to hear the truth than to forbear the investigation. Can it be that in Nevada a trustee by statute may now decant an income-only trust into a trust whose trustee has current principal-invasion authority? 473 (1930), later appeal, 176 Ga. 592, 168 S.E. 155, 812 S.E.2d 532 (2018). 501, 178 S.E. 377 (2011), in which the author argued that, despite the fact that it is unlikely that a defendant could uncover sufficient facts to support affirmative defenses in the 21 days required to file its answer, the only fair standard is to require defendants to plead an adequate factual basis in compliance with Twombly in order to assert affirmative defenses. 16 0 obj Is the Uniform Trust Codes generous reformation section, specifically 415, prying open the litigation floodgates as predicted? Watkins v. Gilmore, 130 Ga. 797, 62 S.E. Doctrine of estoppel by representation is ordinarily applicable only to representations as to facts either past or present, and not to promises concerning the future which, if binding at all, must be binding as contracts. In overruling the long-standing rule of Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) (no complaint should be dismissed unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief), the Court held that a plaintiff must plead factual grounds for entitlement to relief, not merely labels and conclusions and formulaic recitations of the elements of a cause of action. 1270. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. 1184. Recourse at law or in equity of trust beneficiary who is dissatisfied with trustees proposed settlement with insurance company of property-damage claim. Gainesville Glass Co. v. Don Hammond, Inc., 157 Ga. App. The unethical behavior that the plaintiff displayed must be in relation to the complaint itself. Would a devise to the trustee of an inter vivos trust lapse or fail if so-called trust lacked property at time of testators death? Meeks v. Adams La. If terms of a terminated trust fail to specify what now happens to subject property, does the trustee get to keep the property for himself? It is typically used when the individual who is being accused of a breach argues The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that ERISA negated in its sphere of pre-emption a traditional protection afforded property rights incident to the trust relationship. Unclean hands, also referred to as the clean hands or dirty hands doctrine, is a type of legal doctrine that operates as a defense to a complaint. Principle which denies relief to party who has conveyed or transferred property in fraud of his creditors, as affected by execution, as part of, or as contemplated at time of, the fraudulent transaction, of reconveyance or retransfer of the property to him, 89 A.L.R. Certain fraudulent activity can also be a factor in awarding child support and the division of property. - Admissions against one's title to land, and in favor of the title of a third person, will be no estoppel in behalf of one to whom they were not made and who has merely heard of them, it not appearing that they were made for the purpose of being acted upon or with any design or intention that they should be acted upon. WebAlthough the unclean hands doctrine is typically an affirmative defense asserted by a defendant, it may also be asserted by a plaintiff in opposition to an equitable defense - In cases of estoppel through silence there must be not only the right but the duty to speak before failure to do so can operate as an estoppel. - Plaintiff was not estopped by acquiescence from seeking to enjoin violations of restrictive covenants by defendants merely because the same covenants were previously violated by other and different parties by more remote sales. The Uniform Trust Code has no time for guardians ad litem, In the estate-tax-apportionment space, Trust A's beneficiary and Trust B's can be in an involuntary debtor-creditor relationship and one trust's trustee in an involuntary agency relationship. WebAlthough the unclean hands doctrine is typically an affirmative defense asserted by a defendant, it may also be asserted by a plaintiff in opposition to an equitable defense 557 (N.D. Ga. 1980) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). But on the other hand is finality the desire of courts to save their own resources and to have an end to litigating over past events and certainty going into the future. At the intersection of black-letter contract, property, and equity doctrine: In re Citibank August 11, 2020 Wire Transfers, 2021 WL 1652171 (2021). Notice that laches is different than statute of limitations. To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: [Ongoing] Read Latest COVID-19 Guidance, All Aspects, [Hot Topic] Environmental, Social & Governance. Estoppel to contest will or attack its validity, 28 A.L.R.2d 116. CIV.A.13-12416-LTS, 2014 WL 407725 (D. Mass. Estoppel of lessee, because of occupancy of, or other activities in connection with, premises, to assert invalidity of lease because of irregularities in description or defects in execution, 84 A.L.R.2d 920. M.D. When letters make sounds that aren't associated w One goose, two geese. <>stream Note that the plaintiff can also use the unclean hands defense. In debt law, the question is whether you must bring a counterclaim under the FDCPA or risk losing it to claim preclusion. 340, 127 S.E.2d 33, rev'd on other grounds, 218 Ga. 525, 128 S.E.2d 926 (1962) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Construction and application of statute respecting estoppel of insurer where insured was examined by medical examiner, 172 A.L.R. THE LEGAL PROCESS. Unclean Hands, Laches, and other morality-based reasons for Estoppel Unclean hands means youre asking the court to do something to lock in an advantage you obtained immorally. 308. 2023. 10) LGEs sixth affirmative defense includes estoppel, waiver, implied waiver, and/or acquiescence. For example, the plaintiff might bring a breach of contract suit against the defendant. 143. Denial of, or expression of doubt as to paternity or other relationship as estoppel to assert right of inheritance by virtue of such relationship, 33 A.L.R. It comes up a lot inmortgage foreclosure. Infant's misrepresentation as to his age as estopping him from disaffirming his voidable transaction, 29 A.L.R.3d 1270. endstream endobj 387 0 obj <>/MarkInfo<>/Metadata 87 0 R/OCProperties<>/OCGs[]>>/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 381 0 R/StructTreeRoot 248 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 388 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 389 0 obj <>stream Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts addressed the question of whether the heightened pleading standard first annunciated by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) applies to certain affirmative defenses. Such relief is usually sought in the form of specific performance, or an injunction. 310 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). - Without some proper legal cause of action, establishing all the elements of equitable estoppel will not entitle plaintiff to relief. What does laches mean in real estate? Whitchard v. Exchange Nat'l Bank, 15 Ga. App. 477 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). 52 (1908) (decided under former Civil Code 1895, 5152). 24-4-27). Kornegay v. Thompson, 157 Ga. App. 508 (N.D. Ga. 1975), vacated on other grounds, 569 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 9; D.I. 875, 134 S.E.2d 828 (1964); Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc., 220 Ga. 442, 139 S.E.2d 302 (1964) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116);(decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Estoppel to question validity of proceedings extending boundaries of municipality, 101 A.L.R. 679. ?yW Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees. You can explore additional available newsletters here. Fiduciary or confidential relationship as affecting estoppel to plead statute of limitations, 45 A.L.R.3d 630. "The doctrine of unclean hands is unique to equity and has no analog at law. 473, 34 S.E.2d 173 (1945) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). The Trust Being a Multi-Party Relationship, Whom Legal Counsel Represents Can Get Complicated, Why the Classic Legal Terminology of the Anglo-American Trust is in French, Not English: The Law French Phenomenon. In ancient English law (which is the basis of American law), people sometimes regarded the concepts of the law as unchangeable. Co., 148 Ga. App. Estoppel cannot legalize or vitalize that which the law declares unlawful and void. 1482. Renunciation of beneficial interest under inter vivos trust as condition of right to contest its validity, 21 A.L.R.2d 1457. Another rejection of the intent-defeating, sole-benefit-of-the-beneficiaries principle, the policy centerpiece of the Uniform Trust Code, Sole interest or best interest: Equity's traditional default loyalty principle is under attack, The financial advisor who sells a trustee an insurance contract that is inappropriate in light of the trust's purposes risks primary fiduciary liabilty in equity to non-contracting parties. Co., 960 F.2d 1020, 1041 (Fed. . In general, the answer to that is no you can bring it in a separate action. 125 (N.D. Ga. 1977) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Progressive Fire Ins. If two people are sued in the same car crash, and one brings suit (in a court with competent jurisdiction to hear the case), then the other must defend and bring a counterclaim for her injuries that happened in the same crash. WebIn U.S equitable defenses are available for relief at law where the remedy sought is one "at law". 941; 175 A.L.R. (Code 1981, 24-14-29, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, 2/HB 24.). But if you sought damages or other remedies under the FDCPA as part of this defense, you might be crossing the line. 904, 181 S.E. May a trustee with discretionary authority to make principal distributions ever decant for the sole purpose of increasing his/her/its compensation? Hasty v. Castleberry, 293 Ga. 727, 749 S.E.2d 676 (2013). Benge v. Roberts: But an enforceable exculpatory clause in a trust should not always be the last word, Mackey v. Santander Bank, N.A: Yes, but applicable trust law lurks not just in the Uniform Trust Code, Shakman v. Dept. To save this word, you'll need to log in. The estoppel defense is stricken for the same reason the promissory estoppel counterclaim is dismissed"a contract that is void ab initio may not be enforced equitably through estoppel. 584, 114 S.E.2d 545 (1960) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). 24-4-27). If the law provided that a son would inherit from his father upon his fathers death, for example, then thatlegalright would attach no matter how the fathers death occurred. City of Atlanta v. Anglin, 209 Ga. 170, 71 S.E.2d 419, appeal dismissed, 344 U.S. 870, 73 S. Ct. 169, 97 L. Ed. - Equitable estoppel is an established principle of Georgia law and arises when a party has so acted that the party has by the party's conduct either gained some advantage for the party or caused some disadvantage to another by reason of which it would be contrary to equity and good conscience to permit the party to allege and prove the truth. HWYo9~jI`Kv[13(:bjC=:AVjM72]E ~th,7@(z~ @|./4lR-P$A*P#C?4b[;T|oON#}M(dp/O 904 (Bankr. One moose, two moose. Sabin Meyer Regional Sales Corp. v. Citizens Bank, 502 F. Supp. Does a trust beneficiary incur any personal liability? 1166. Defendant's other affirmative defenses, such as copyright misuse, abandonment, unclean hands, and estoppel, are essentially frivolous and may be disposed of briefly. 403 0 obj <>stream - Regardless of the amount of expenditures holder of franchise and transferee might have made in connection therewith, no equitable estoppel would arise against city barring it from challenging validity of the franchise since there was evidence to show such expenses were incurred with knowledge of the invalidity of the franchise and therefore good faith was wholly lacking. Co. v. Tennille Banking Co. (In re Smith), 51 Bankr. Post the Definition of unclean hands to Facebook, Share the Definition of unclean hands on Twitter. 4+@r0U4(NvAESln PKX0id/jza!D4;@Y 4sg1%x:[;C`r$UY[vYyhh6)R4W 4JC%%NY2K. - In a second trial of a case, a party is not estopped to give testimony at the second trial which is different from the party's testimony given at the first trial. endobj endstream endobj 390 0 obj <>stream And they can be attacked by motion to dismiss. Unclean hands, misuse, or estoppel can render a potential verdict unenf. Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc., 220 Ga. 442, 139 S.E.2d 302 (1964) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116); Travelodge Corp. v. Carwen Realty Co., 223 Ga. 821, 158 S.E.2d 378 (1967); Whitco Produce Co. v. Bonanza Int'l, Inc., 154 Ga. App. 183. In equity, the plaintiff will not prevail if he or she has unclean hands. 9 rVB~Z} lVC%N\j~*Z8B: ,@Eg=. Beeland v. Alston, 101 Ga. App. This issue was recently the subject of a thoughtful law review article, James V. Bilek, Twombly, Iqbal, and Rule 8(c): Assessing the Proper Standard to Apply to Affirmative Defenses, 15 Chap. - One who has title to land and sees another who is in bona fide possession thereof place valuable improvements thereon, without giving notice of one's title, is not thereby subsequently estopped from asserting ones' title. this Section. 204 (1980). Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 689 (1895). MF But the Uniform Trust Code leaves in place critical equity doctrine, such as unjust enrichment jurisprudence: Litigators beware. 3 0 obj Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Sherrod, 50 Ga. App. (D.I. If the defendant can prove that the plaintiff has unclean hands, i.e., acted unethically, then the plaintiffs complaint will be dismissed. Estoppel by apparent acquiescence in or silence concerning improvements of real property to assert antagonistic title or interest, 76 A.L.R. Injury is its essence. In Telecom Brokerage, Inc. v. Gryphone Telecom Consultants, LLC, et al., No. Cas. 675 (1952) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Statutes of limitations are legally determined time limits (and are themselves subject to equity-based attack). Trustees and the privilege against self-incrimination, The fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege in the trust context, Some non-US trust jurisdictions may not recognize the revocable inter vivos trust, Employing the term spouse in trust instruments: An unambiguous term can still be textually ambiguous, A contingent remainderman's interest under an irrevocable trust: More than a mere expectancy. The doctrine of judicial estoppel serves to prevent litigants from asserting claims in a court proceeding that are directly contrary or inconsistent to a prior statement made in a previous proceeding. - When in a case no facts appear from which it can be said that a party has been injured or placed at any disadvantage by the conduct of the party allegedly estopped, no estoppel resulted therefrom. - When the facts relied on to establish estoppel do not unequivocally show an estoppel in pais, the jury, and not the judge, should determine whether the facts constitute such an estoppel. Since this type of defense can be complicated, you might want to hire an experienced attorney who can help you determine if this defense is in fact available for you. May a vindicated trustee be reimbursed personally from the trust estate even for those defense costs that were covered by his liability-insurance carrier? Draining the marital trust first in the face of different remaindermen: What about the trustees duty of impartiality? 477 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Lanier v. Bryant, 180 Ga. 409, 179 S.E. When a current trust beneficiary is temporarily lacking: What should be done with income accruing during hiatus? 24-4-27). Rather, it is specific conduct. Mid-Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. City of Covington, 211 Ga. 163, 84 S.E.2d 451 (1954) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). The equity court is there for the trustee as well as the beneficiaries, When adjudicating trust disputes, the equity courts are duty-bound to act, sua sponte if necessary, in vindication of the lawful intentions of settlors, The Doctrine of Renvoi may still have some relevance in the trust context, Tracing and recovering real estate wrongfully removed from trusts: End-running the full-faith-and-credit obstacle, A message to the Divorce Bar: The constructive trust and the resulting trust are creatures of and regulated by general principles of equity, not the Uniform Trust Code, Good luck to the trustee who would endeavor to forge beneficiary-consensus as to ESG Investing objectives, The poor excuse for a tort that lurks in the Uniform Trust Codes certificate-of-trust regime. n. a legal doctrine which is a defense to a complaint, which states that a party who is asking for a judgment cannot have the help of the court if he/she has done It has to do with something called res judicata or claim preclusion. It is important for pro se litigants to understand these and other equitable concepts, including the doctrines of unclean hands and laches. Is a trust term directing that internal trustee-beneficiary fiduciary disputes be arbitrated judicially enforceable? Promissory Estoppel & Washing Unclean Hands. 690. XAYaO>%rHWCZf)9o||Da txX]AsAL*.ji~;)#9C2u^jw-K,w}s1!&C%f('` h 634. The Uniform Trust Decanting Act's conflicting commentary, The public policy case against retroactively applying new trust law, A controversy is brewing over whether a Hungarian trust is a true trust, or just a type of contract. 1501. Co. v. Morrison, 72 Ga. App. Owen v. Miller, 209 Ga. 875, 76 S.E.2d 772 (1953) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). 726, 179 S.E. Laches is also a morality-based defense, but in this case it involves delay. If my landlord breached an agreement that I do hmk8>qz$XMvAobZs]7#[8/b&5/FaD:MfKgCl "1cpp` NOt:9_:u'&f-(b.$gB|~8FUp+.K:oU{7Esn'b ynu(_Ze~. clean hands. If the delay is unreasonable and your bank burns down, destroying proof of payment of a debt, for example, this might create a defense of laches. Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc., 220 Ga. 442, 139 S.E.2d 302 (1964) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). The fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege: A recent development, The enforceability of a trust accounting clauses failure-to-object provision (the non-judicial settlement of trustees accounts). What Does It Mean to Be Party to a Lawsuit. Could seeking judicial enforcement of a trust's no-contest clause implicate the state's anti-SLAPP statute? 345. I have spoken elsewhere of the policy of deciding cases on the merits (based on real justice) rather than technicalities, and this, for example, is why motions to vacate defaults often work. d`\ '&Nl Burden of proof rests upon the party asserting an estoppel to establish all the elements necessary to constitute an estoppel. At the close of all evidence, Shaw moved for a directed verdict on each of Gees Unclean Hands, Laches, and other morality-based reasons for Estoppel Unclean hands means youre asking the court to do something to lock in an advantage Abandonment of appeal or right of appeal by commencement, or prosecution to judgment, of another action, 115 A.L.R. This allows the court to consider all the facts and all the rights, and come up with one, final resolution to the entire conflict. Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced searchad free! Estoppel of one riparian owner to complain of diversion of water by another riparian owner, 74 A.L.R. Echoes of the Doctrine of Worthier Title in current trust law. endstream 1580. However, if the plaintiff acted in bad faith when initially drafting the contract, then the defendant can raise the unclean hands defense, among other potential defenses. Purchaser's right to set up invalidity of contract because of violation of state securities regulation as affected by doctrines of estoppel or pari delicto, 84 A.L.R.2d 479. Estoppel of mortgagor or seller to deny existence of property mortgaged or sold, 40 A.L.R. 152; 48 A.L.R.2d 1069. - There is no estoppel by conduct when both parties have equal knowledge or equal means of obtaining the truth. Though there may be no unclean-hands analog at law, the equitable doctrine of judicial estoppel serves a similar purpose, namely, to protect the integrity of the judicial process by prohibiting parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment. See State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 121 S. Ct. 1808 (2001). Merger Doctrine, the Common Trust Fund, the Trusteed Mutual Fund, Common-Fund Doctrine, Combining Trusts, Common Fund of Related Sub-trusts: Which is not about trust investing? If the defendant brings the unclean hands defense, then the plaintiff could also be found to have unclean hands even if that conduct isnt identical to the wrongful conduct that the defendant engaged in. The defendant has to prove that the plaintiff misled him or her in some way, or otherwise did something wrong regarding the matter. Only the trust, as opposed to the will, can facilitate the inter vivos bestowal on others of vested yet retrievable property rights in ones property. 1405. Accordingly, it holds a person to a representation made or position assumed where otherwise inequitable consequences would result to another who, having the right to do so, under all the circumstances of the case, has in good faith relied thereon and been misled, to that person's injury. The Court began its analysis by citing the general principle that courts do not view motions to strike affirmative defenses favorably and that pleadings should be treated liberally. Affirmative Defenses to Breach of Contract California, Breach of Contract Defenses: Everything you Need to Know, Necessity in Criminal Law: Criminal Defense. 619. % 1978) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116). Build a Morning News Digest: Easy, Custom Content, Free! It must be proven, however, that the claimant has Byers v. McGuire Props., 285 Ga. 530, 679 S.E.2d 1 (2009), overruled on other grounds by SRM Group, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. The fascinating story behind many people's favori Test your vocabulary with our 10-question quiz! Is a human corpse property that can be made the subject of a trust? A trust in mid-course is declared void ab initio by the equity court: What now happens to the property? Only if the plaintiff engaged in wrongful conduct relating to the contract can the unclean hands defense be used. Membership Corp. v. Board of Lights & Water Works, 211 Ga. 535, 87 S.E.2d 80 (1955); Jones v. Tri-State Elec. Co. v. Atlantic & Gulf Shipping Co., 51 Ga. App. An equitable defense that bars relief to a party who has engaged in inequitable behavior (including fraud, deceit, unconscionability or bad faith) related to the subject matter of that partys claim. The unclean hands doctrine may also be referred to as the dirty hands doctrine. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains. Mediation and Arbitration have their limitations when it comes to trust disputes. A.S. Int'l Corp. v. Salem Carpet Mills, Inc., 441 F. Supp. Synchronizing the will and will substitute via the Uniform Probate Code and the Uniform Trust Code: Whatever for and how is it coming along? - Party seeking the benefit of estoppel must not only have been free from fraud, but must have acted in good faith and reasonable diligence; otherwise no equity will arise in that party's favor. What agreement or conduct subsequent to assignment of lease amounts to assumption by assignee of covenants of lease, or estoppel to deny such assumption, 148 A.L.R. 190, 82 S.E. WebThe meaning of UNCLEAN HANDS is an equitable doctrine: a complainant will be denied relief if he or she has engaged in misconduct (as acting in bad faith) directly relating to 256. Promissory estoppel as basis for avoidance of statute of frauds, 56 A.L.R.3d 1037. Does the settlor of a trust have standing to seek its enforcement in the courts? Since this is a defense that can be raised by the plaintiff or defendant, you should work with an attorney who can assist you during the contract dispute. They are designed (by laws passed by legislatures) to allow time to bring finality, eventually, so that people can make plans eventually without being haunted by their alleged wrongs forever. They write law school tests about questions like that, and it is one reason I always preferred to bring all counterclaims and defenses in the defense when I was practicing. Co. v. Garner, 184 Ga. 283, 191 S.E. See: clean hands doctrine. The conduct could be either legal or moral in nature. In most states that means that you must plead thefactsconstituting the entire defense in your Answer as an affirmative defense. Insurer's admission of liability, offers of settlement, and negotiations for adjustment or settlement, as waiver of proof of property loss, 49 A.L.R.2d 87. In Twombly (adopted by Massachusetts in Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co., 451 Mass. The record reflects that the vehicle being kept on appellants property is a house trailer as contemplated by the deed restrictions. WebIn sum, on any view, defendant's "fair use" defense is indefensible and must be denied as a matter of law. 914; 153 A.L.R. If not, to whom should title now pass? 976 (1908) (decided under former Civil Code 1895, 5152). WebEstoppel by laches is a legal belief that defendants in courts of law sometimes use to deny a person relief when making a claim. 557 (N.D. Ga. 1980) (decided under former Code 1933, 38-116).
Where Does Connor And Liana Live 2021, Articles U

unclean hands and estoppel 2023